IMPACT PLAYERS

Give me your opinions, when an impact player(or non impact player)gets "in the zone" and starts flashing, he gets faster, breaks more tackles, throws more accurately, causes more turnovers on defense,etc...I have had people call me a cheater when i play smashmouth football when my halfback gets "in the zone". "Run glitching" was the exact term that was used. Now when a player is "in the zone", wouldnt it be smart to keep feeding him the ball? I mean yea he can be a good decoy also but i always thought getting your playmaker the ball was a good recipe for success. Im pretty decent at running the ball on this game even though my substandard .500 record does not reflect this. Im pretty sure that most of you get plenty of gripes and complaints from sore losers but wouldnt it be cool if your opponent couldnt see that a player on your team was "in the zone"?

p.s. sorry for the long paragraph.

People complain cuz they can't stop the run. There's no glitching to running, they just don't know how to stop it. Impact players are a great feature in my opinion.

yeah they are a good feature to the game...u have some ppl that cant stop running or cant stop passing either....so they complain about this is a glitch or that is a glitch....take it from someone that used the pistol formation with florida....ppl used to tell me that it was a "cheese" playbook... i used to laugh at them when they said that...then i got trojan to teach me something and they said i was trying to be a replica of him....ppl are so lame sometimes...u just have to ignore it all

Yea i especially liked the newly revised impact player feature after NCAA 2008 came out, you know where anybody(even nonimpact players) can get "in the zone". Can you remember back when the feature first came out on ncaa 2006 when only impact players could power up, and it was kinda random when it would happen.

My only response is you know whats coming now stop it...

i agree with ZIMM